Current:Home > ContactEarn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income. -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Earn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income.
Algosensey View
Date:2025-03-11 08:35:27
Single people in San Francisco who earn less than $104,400 are considered low income, according to new government guidelines that determine who qualifies for some housing aid.
That means that some people in California who are earning above six figures — a level that's viewed as high income by many Americans — may in fact struggle to afford the basics in those regions. Other California counties where a salary of about $100,000 for a single person qualifies as low income include Marin and San Mateo counties, with the latter home to Silicon Valley.
Single workers in Los Angeles County, meanwhile, are considered low income if they earn less than $70,000, according to the new guidelines issued earlier this month by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
The income guidelines are used to determine whether people may qualify for housing programs, including Section 8 vouchers that provide rent assistance to low-income families. It may be shocking that a six-figure earner in San Francisco could qualify for housing assistance, but the median home sale price in the city was $1.4 million in May 2023, according to Zillow.
Meanwhile, the official poverty line across the U.S. stands at $12,880 for a single person, which is a guideline used for other aid programs such as food stamps and the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
San Francisco is struggling with a host of issues, including businesses that are fleeing the city amid a rise in crime and homelessness, as well as an exodus of workers and residents as many tech companies switched to remote work during the pandemic. But despite those challenges, San Francisco remains home to many big businesses — and its real estate fetches a hefty price.
Since 2016, the threshold to be considered low income as a single worker has jumped by more than $35,000, according to the San Francisco Examiner.
- In:
- Los Angeles
- Real Estate
- California
- San Francisco
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Cuba Gooding Jr. Settles Civil Sexual Abuse Case
- Ashley Tisdale Enters Her French Girl Era With New Curtain Bangs
- Gigi Hadid Spotted at Same London Restaurant as Leonardo DiCaprio and His Parents
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Explosive devices detonated, Molotov cocktail thrown at Washington, D.C., businesses
- What is the Higher Education Act —and could it still lead to student loan forgiveness?
- DeSantis Recognizes the Threat Posed by Climate Change, but Hasn’t Embraced Reducing Carbon Emissions
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Supreme Court takes up case over gun ban for those under domestic violence restraining orders
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Transcript: Former Attorney General Eric Holder on Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
- The Warming Climates of the Arctic and the Tropics Squeeze the Mid-latitudes, Where Most People Live
- 9 shot, 2 suffer traumatic injuries at Wichita nightclub
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Massachusetts Sues Exxon Over Climate Change, Accusing the Oil Giant of Fraud
- Michigan Tribe Aims to Block Enbridge Pipeline Spill Settlement
- State Department report on chaotic Afghan withdrawal details planning and communications failures
Recommendation
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
New Climate Warnings in Old Permafrost: ‘It’s a Little Scary Because it’s Happening Under Our Feet.’
The Ultimatum: Queer Love Relationship Status Check: Who's Still Together?
Gigi Hadid Spotted at Same London Restaurant as Leonardo DiCaprio and His Parents
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Indiana Supreme Court ruled near-total abortion ban can take effect
Supreme Court takes up case over gun ban for those under domestic violence restraining orders
This Is the Only Lip Product You Need in Your Bag This Summer